Last updated: 10.30am on Monday 18 March 2024
The following Q&A provides detail on ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ’s undergraduate admissions processes for international and home students.
This is further to media reports on undergraduate student admissions to universities, especially as regards International Foundation Programmes.
ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ has a robust, transparent, equitable and published admissions policy that is consistently applied at every stage of the recruitment process. 
Entry to degree courses is not made available to international students at the expense of home students.
We have separate recruitment streams for home and international students.
Over 70% of our undergraduate students are from the UK (2022/23 figures: latest available).
Our admissions decisions are made by ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ staff.
Admissions decisions are made by ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ trained admissions staff in line with our published admissions criteria.
International Foundation Programmes are intensive, year-long courses which offer a route of progression to degree courses.
They are not new. ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ has admitted students from such programmes for the last two decades and from our International Study Centre since the 2017/2018 academic year. We have always been completely transparent about this.
Our International Foundation Programme is run by a third-party partner, Study Group. It provides a one-year foundation programme for students mainly coming from countries that have 12-year school systems (schools in England and Wales have 13-year systems).
There is also a one-year pre-Masters programme. Students enter full Masters programmes at ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ if they meet all the University’s stringent entry requirements at the end of that programme.
Students undertaking International Foundation Programmes are required to meet challenging progression requirements at the end of the year to transfer to a degree course. These are published on our website.
There are high standards for admission to our International Foundation Programmes. There are also high standards for progression for degree study at ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ which are consistently applied.
We do not compromise on quality.
Entry grades to our degree programmes from international foundation programmes are benchmarked against our entry requirements for students applying to the University directly.
We have high entry standards to ensure outstanding students can reach their potential in studying with us. We periodically benchmark performance of our ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ International Study Centre (DUISC) students against the performance of students coming through direct entry routes.
A story in the Sunday Times, published on 27 January 2024, misleadingly conflates the entry requirements for foundation year programmes and entry requirements for degree programmes.
The Sunday Times story ignores this crucial difference.
This critical detail was highlighted with the newspaper more than once but not reflected in their report.
The Sunday Times report shares details relating to entry requirements for International Foundation Programmes, not ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ degree programmes.
These foundation requirements are not comparable to entry requirements to our degree programmes, as published on our website.
We refute the comments made to the Sunday Times by a third party that the International Foundation Programme’s pass rate was 100% and students never fail. This is plain wrong. We do not see 100% progression to our degree programmes.
The inaccurate and misleading comments made by a third party about entry to ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ were never put to the University before publication of the Sunday Times article. This was made clear in our numerous representations to the newspaper on the 27, 28 and 29 January.
The facts regarding progression from our International Foundation Programme to ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ undergraduate degree courses were clarified on the evening of Monday 29 January by the Sunday Times in an amendment to their online report.
The actual progression rate for this academic year was 74%.  
ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ entry requirements for international students who have completed International Foundation Years are benchmarked to ensure they are equivalent to those for home students entering with A levels or equivalent.
We require equivalent academic and English language standards, whether students apply to us having completed an International Foundation programme or directly.
For example, to progress to an LLB Law degree at ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ (direct entry A*AA), students must achieve average marks of at least 80 per cent for an International Foundation programme and the same results from the separate National Aptitude Test for Law (LNAT) as home/UK applicants.
To clarify and emphasise information already shared with the Sunday Times and other media outlets, we do also offer a pathway for home students through a foundation programme, with similar entry requirements to those coming via an international pathway.
Like many higher education institutions, ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ works with several international recruitment agents. We have robust standards and processes for recruiting and managing our agents.
The role of recruitment agents is to raise awareness of the ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ opportunities in international recruitment markets to potential applicants. They also provide potential applicants with guidance on the UK university application process.
We expect consistently high standards from our agents. We always expect information provided to prospective students to be of high quality. Where an agent falls below those standards, decisive action will be taken.
ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ signed up to the when it launched in December 2023.
ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ entered briefly into Clearing for 2023 for both home and international students, the first time in 10 years.
Clearing was open through July and August 2023 after students achieved their academic qualifications.
The reason for going into Clearing was to encourage and attract better qualified candidates with higher grades to come to ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ.
In 2023, we recruited around 150 students through Clearing - of whom two-thirds were home students - out of an overall undergraduate recruitment cohort of 4,752.
We have separate recruitment streams for home and international students, and this also applies to Clearing.
International students do not receive preferential treatment over home students.
In making admissions decisions, we may offer flexibility for special circumstances for both international and home students.
However, we never compromise on our minimum acceptable grades for entry to ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ for both international and home students.
We only conduct interviews for our BA Primary Education. Interview is compulsory and obligatory for any qualified applicant, regardless of whether they are home or overseas, for professional reasons.
The ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ International Study Centre Foundation programmes are provided by Study Group in collaboration with ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ.
Study Group aim to give international students the best chance of success in progressing to a degree at the University.
ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ is a leading, high-quality university. Our academic decisions are made, first and foremost, on applicant qualifications and achievements. We never compromise on academic standards.
ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ sets very clear expectations with Study Group on the quality, standards, and entry of students to our degree programmes which are equivalent to those who complete A-Levels or similar.
As an example, to progress to an LLB Law degree at ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ (direct entry A*AA), students must achieve average marks of at least 80 per cent for an international foundation programme and the same results from the separate National Aptitude Test for Law (LNAT) as home/UK applicants.
We monitor closely quality and student outcomes, with the vast majority of students from the international foundation course pathway achieving first class or 2:1 degrees.
Entry to ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ degree courses is emphatically not made available to international students at the expense of home students, as we have separate recruitment streams for each.
For the past three years we have admitted an average of 316 students per year from the international foundation pathway to ÒùÂÒÉ«ÇéƬ undergraduate degree programmes.”
Please see also the response from Study Group to the Sunday Times:
Higher Education mission groups have also responded to recent media stories on international students. See the links below.
Russell Group:
Universities UK:
Other sector responses to this issue:
/prod01/prodbucket01/media/durham-university/external-location-photography-/campus-shots-/71753.jpg)